Cascadity
← All streams

#Supreme-Court

Everything tagged Supreme-Court, across every stream.

0

Supreme Court allows revamped federal voter-eligibility database to be used for now

The dispute pits election-integrity checks against concerns that rushed citizenship matching could wrongly remove eligible voters.

What happened

The Supreme Court allowed states, for now, to use a revamped federal database intended to help check voter eligibility before the midterms. The system is part of the administration's effort to identify noncitizens who may be registered.

Republican / administration case

Republicans supporting the system say citizenship verification is a basic election-integrity measure and that states should have access to federal data that can identify ineligible registrations.

Democratic / critic case

Democrats and voting-rights advocates argue that noncitizen voting is already extremely rare and warn that database matching errors could improperly flag eligible citizens close to an election.

Libertarian / Cato case

Cato election-policy writers have argued that documented noncitizen voting is extremely rare and have criticized federal attempts to override states' constitutional role in running elections. Their concern combines federalism, accuracy and due process.

Where the disagreement really is

There is broad agreement that only eligible citizens should vote. The fight is over how large the problem is and how much risk of false positives is acceptable in trying to prevent it.

From each bank
0

Missouri's Trump-backed congressional map heads back into Supreme Court fight

The case could decide which map Missouri uses just weeks before the midterms—and highlights the broader fight over mid-decade partisan redistricting.

What happened

A federal appeals court backed a Republican-drawn Missouri congressional map that could improve the GOP's chances of winning seven of the state's eight House seats. State courts and the U.S. Supreme Court had previously blocked use of the map, and the dispute returned to the Supreme Court.

Republican case

Republican officials argue the legislature had authority to redraw the districts and that changing back after the new map was already used in a primary would create constitutional and administrative problems.

Democratic case

Democrats argue the map is a mid-decade partisan gerrymander designed to dismantle Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver's district and manufacture an additional Republican seat.

Libertarian / Cato case

Cato's longstanding position is that both parties abuse redistricting when they control the process. It favors objective criteria, transparency and structures that reduce politicians' ability to choose their voters.

Where the disagreement really is

Beyond the immediate legal question, the larger dispute is whether elected officials should be able to redraw districts between censuses primarily for partisan advantage.

From each bank